Quercus geminata
(Quercus is an ancient name for oaks. Geminata, referring to the acorns, means twinned, as in Gemini.)
Fagaceae, the Oak Family
Talking with John and Dee Staley today got us all thinking about the Florida scrubby Oaks, given that Dee cultivates the acorns to replant to restore Scrub Jay habitat. A single Scrub Jay can cache more acorns than the best overachiever squirrel, and the Jays “like” Sand Live Oak for nesting. Around South Florida there are several small Oaks associated with dry sandy habitats. The main three locally are Myrtle Oak, Chapman’s Oak, and Sand Live Oak. Although they occupy similar sun-cooked, nutrient-poor, white sugar sand scrub, they are not closely related, and have conspicuous differences. Today’s featured species is the Sand Live Oak.

Sand Live Oak is kin to the big old venerable Live Oaks emblematic of the South. The two species are so similar that some botanists have classified them as variants of a single species. However, DNA, flowering-times, and different soil-water preferences suggest regarding them as distinct species. even if they do hybridize sometimes. The important thing is that they are more closely related to each other than either is to anyone else. Sister species, with Sand Live Oak probably having “branched off” of Live Oak long ago on the evolutionary tree of Oaks.

Sand Live Oak reveals its common ancestry with Live Oak, in my humble opinion, by occasionally forming “Live Oak” leaves. Generally the two have different leaves, those in Live Oak being flat, minimally hairy underneath, and elliptic to somewhat toothy and lobed. (Keep that elliptic, toothy, and lobed part in mind.)

Sand Live Oak differs by having its leaf blades long and narrow with the edges curled down strongly and a dense mass of felty hairs beneath. But, wait a moment, an occasional Sand Live Oak branch has “Live Oak” leaves: flat and lobed/toothy.

How weird. A throwback to its ancestral species? Sand Live Oak must have “Live Oak” genes, suppressed most of the time yet able once in awhile to break through. Who needs a DNA test to see the close relationship? Both species on the same tree.
I have some throwbacks to my ancestral species too. You know, useless fur, pointy canine teeth, tail(bones) aka my coccyx, you might say a suppressed carryovers from my own primate ancestors who had all that stuff for real.


To turn to a different species (see comments), here are two different Myrtle Oaks:








































